Synaesthesia and savantism

“We only use 10% of our brain”. I don’t know where that idea originated but it certainly took off as a popular meme – taxi drivers seem particularly taken with it. It’s rubbish of course – you use more than that just to see. But it captures an idea that we humans have untapped intellectual potential – that in each of us individually, or at least in humans in general lies the potential for genius.

Part of what has fed into that idea is the existence of so-called “savants” – people who have some isolated area of special intellectual ability far beyond most other individuals. Common examples of savant abilities include prodigious mental calculations, calendar calculations and remarkable feats of memory. These can arise due to brain injuries, or be apparently congenital. In congenital cases, savant abilities are often encountered against a background of the general intellectual, social or communicative symptoms of autism. (The portrayal by Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man is a good example, based on the late, well known savant Kim Peek).

A new hypothesis proposes that savantism arises due to a combination of autism and another condition, synaesthesia. Synaesthesia is commonly thought of as a cross-sensory phenomenon, where, for example, different sounds will induce the experience of particular colours, or tastes will induce the tactile experience of a shape. But in most cases the stimuli that induce synaesthesia are not sensory, but conceptual categories of learned objects, such as letters, numbers, days of the week, months of the year. The most common types involve coloured letters or numbers and what are called mental “number forms”.

These go beyond the typical mental number line that most of us can visualise from early textbooks. They are detailed, stable and idiosyncratic forms in space around the person, where each number occupies a specific position. They may follow complicated trajectories through space, even wrapping around the individual’s body in some cases. These forms can be related to different reference points (body, head or gaze-oriented) and can sometimes be mentally manipulated by synaesthetes to examine them more closely at specific positions.

The suggestion in relation to savantism is that such forms enable arithmetical calculations to be carried out in some kind of spatial, intuitive way that is distinct from the normal operations of formal arithmetic – but only when the brain is wired in such a way to take advantage of these special reprepsentations of numbers, as apparently can arise due to autism.

It has been proposed that the intense and narrowly focused interests typical of autism can lead to prolonged practice of these skills, which thus emerge and improve over time. While certainly likely to be involved in the development of these skills, on its own this explanation seems insufficient. It seems more likely that these special abilities arise from more fundamental differences in the way the brains of autistic people process information, with a greater degree of processing of local detail, paralleled by greater local connectivity in neural circuits and reductions in long-range integration.

Local processing may normally be actively inhibited. This idea has been referred to as the tyranny of the frontal lobes (especially of the left hemisphere), which impart top-down expectations with such authority that they override lower areas, conscripting them into service for the greater good. The potential of the local elements to process detailed information is thus superseded in order to achieve optimal global performance. The idea that local processing is actively suppressed is supported by the fact that savant abilities can sometimes emerge after frontal lobe injuries or in cases of frontotemporal dementia. Increased skills in numerical estimation can also, apparently, be induced in healthy people by using transcranial magnetic stimulation to temporarily inactivate part of the left hemisphere.

This kind of focus on local details, combined with an exceptional memory, may explain many types of savant skills, including musical and artistic ones. As many as 10% of autistics show some savant ability. These “islands of genius” (including things like perfect pitch, for example) are typically remarkable only on the background of general impairment – they would be less remarkable in the general population. Really prodigious savants are much more rare – these are people who can do things outside the range of normal abilities, such as phenomenal mathematical calculations. In these cases, the increased local processing typical of autism may not be, by itself, sufficient to explain the supranormal ability.

The idea is that such prodigious calculations may also rely on the concrete visual representations of numbers found in some types of synaesthesia. This theory was originally proposed by Simon Baron-Cohen and colleagues and arose from case studies of individual savants, including Daniel Tammett, an extraordinary man who has both Asperger’s syndrome and synaesthesia.

I had the pleasure of speaking with Daniel recently about his particular talents on the FutureProof radio programme for Dublin’s Newstalk Radio. (The podcast, from Nov 27th, 2010, can be accessed, with some perseverance, here). Daniel is unique in many ways. He has the prodigious mental talents of many savants, for arithmetic calculations and memory, but also has the insight and communicative skills to describe what is going on in his head. It is these descriptions that have fueled the idea that the mental calculations he performs rely on his synaesthetic number forms.

Daniel experiences numbers very differently from most people. He sees numbers in his mind’s eye as occupying specific positions in space. They also have characteristic colours, textures, movement, sounds and, importantly, shapes. Sequences of numbers form “landscapes in his mind”. This is vividly portrayed in the excellent BBC documentary “The Boy With the Incredible Brain” and described by Daniel in his two books, “Born on a Blue Day” and “Embracing the Wide Sky”.

His synaesthetic experiences of numbers are an intrinsic part of his arithmetical abilities. (I say arithmetical, as opposed to mathematical, because his abilities seem to be limited to prodigious mental calculations, as opposed to a talent for advanced calculus or other areas of mathematics). Daniel describes doing these calculations by some kind of mental spatial manipulation of the shapes of numbers and their positions in space. When he is performing these calculations he often seems to be tracing shapes with his fingers. He is, however, hard pressed to define this process exactly – it seems more like his brain does the calculation and he reads off the answer, apparently deducing the value based at least partly on the shape of the resultant number.

Daniel is also the European record holder for rembering the digits of the number pi - to over 20,000 decimal places. This feat also takes advantage of the way that he visualises numbers – he describes moving along a landscape of the digits of pi, which he sees in his mind’s eye and which enables him to recall each digit in sequence. The possible generality of this single case study is bolstered by reports of other savants, who similarly utilise visuospatial forms in their calculations and who report that they simply “see” the correct answer (see review by Murray).

Additional evidence to support the idea comes from studies testing whether the concrete and multimodal representations of numbers or units of time are associated with enhanced cognitive abilities in synaesthetes who are not autistic. Several recent studies suggest this is indeed the case.

Many synaesthetes say that having particular colours or spatial positions for letters and numbers helps them remember names, phone numbers, dates, etc. Ward and colleagues have tested whether these anecdotal reports would translate into better performance on memory tasks and found that they do. Synaesthetes did show better than average memory, but importantly, only for those items which were part of their synaesthetic experience. Their general memory was no better than non-synaesthete controls. Similarly, Simner and colleagues have found that synaesthetes with spatial forms for time units perform better on visuospatial tasks such as mental rotation of 3D objects.

Synaesthesia and autism are believed to occur independently and, as each only occurs in a small percentage of people, the joint occurrence is very rare. Of course, it remains possible that, even though most people with synaesthesia do not have autism and vice versa, their co-occurrence in some cases may reflect a single cause. Further research will be required to determine definitively the possible relationship between these conditions. For now, the research described above, especially the first-person accounts of Daniel Tammett and others, gives a unique insight into the rich variety of human experience, including fundamental differences in perception and cognitive style.

Murray, A. (2010). Can the existence of highly accessible concrete representations explain savant skills? Some insights from synaesthesia Medical Hypotheses, 74 (6), 1006-1012 DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.01.014

Bor, D., Billington, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2008). Savant Memory for Digits in a Case of Synaesthesia and Asperger Syndrome is Related to Hyperactivity in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Neurocase, 13 (5), 311-319 DOI: 10.1080/13554790701844945

Simner, J., Mayo, N., & Spiller, M. (2009). A foundation for savantism? Visuo-spatial synaesthetes present with cognitive benefits Cortex, 45 (10), 1246-1260 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.007

Yaro, C., & Ward, J. (2007). Searching for Shereshevskii: What is superior about the memory of synaesthetes? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60 (5), 681-695 DOI: 10.1080/17470210600785208


  1. Fascinating stuff. I do wonder how representative Daniel Tammet is, though. What about savants who don't have autism? (Or synesthesia, for that matter?). This theory seems like it'll explain Daniel Tammet and probably a lot of other people, but do you think it can explain savant syndrome in general?

  2. That's a good question. There may well be different types of savantism. It is estimated that about 50% of savants have autism, while many of the rest have some other developmental diagnosis, so whether autism per se is really involved in all savant cases is an open question. It is not known how many have this kind of visuospatial synaesthesia (especially as it is not a clinical condition and is thus not commonly screened for). That would certainly be an interesting and fairly straightforward study to answer that question!

  3. Great discussion, thank you!
    It would be nice to know more about Tammet's PFC and the relationship with savantism...
    You mention that Baron-Cohen research article that includes Tammer as a subject. They seem to have found some hyperactivity in the PFC (as per the title I have not read the paper). Is that, in this case, considered to lead to a prefrontal control deficit, which would in turn favor local processing and fit one of the hypotheses you are describing? What is interesting is that Tammet seems to be a perfectly normal individual psychologically-speaking, which suggests a normally-functioning PFC.
    Any further thoughts on that?

    1. He need to look if there is any update with this in meantime I do R and D on same and will comment here so that it will help.

  4. Another comment...
    I recently blogged about an fMRI study on what changes in brain networks occur with literacy. One of the findings showed that the area of the brain that process written language also gets activated in response to faces and that this response decreases when one acquires reading skills. I also read on Tammet's wiki page that he speaks and reads 9 languages and... that he has impaired memory for people's faces! Wonder if the two are related... That is actually one of the prediction of that paper that I was commenting on.

    See my post at

  5. Those are great questions, thanks. The fMRI study of DT involved a number of different tasks, including the "digit span" task - a memory task where people have to recall a string of digits. These digits can be either structure (e.g., 24689753) or unstructured. Control individuals showed better recall of structured sequences and also greater activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex. The inference is that they are using the structure of the sequence to "chunk" the digits into meaningful subsequences. DT performed just as well for unstructured as for structured sequences and showed greater activation of the LPFC to both kinds of stimuli (in fact, he reported that he did not notice any difference between them, unlike controls, who readily differentiated the structured sequences). The inference is that his synaesthesia provides an inherent structure to any set of digits, which he sees as a landscape (like pi, above), so that he is always using that kind of chunking memory strategy.

    This particular study did not really address the other point you raise, about prefrontal control of local processing.

    And you are correct that Daniel speaks a large number of languages fluently. Whether that relates at all to his prosopagnosia, I couldn't say. (By the way, for more on the latter, see:

  6. You guys should check out the book "Moonwalking with Einstein." In one chapter the author makes a compelling case against some of Daniel's claims.

  7. I haven't read that book but have heard about it and it sounds interesting - all about techniques for amazing feats of memory, right? Starting with Aristotle's loci method, if I remember correctly (should have tried that method!). I would be interested to hear more about how it argues against Daniel's claims and which claims that refers to.

  8. ohh, I remember that movie!! RAINMAN, if I'm not mistake. so wonderfull, oneof the best ever

    buy homework

  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

  10. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  11. I'd like to add to the posts above about Joshua Foer's investigations into Tammet. Joshua Foer presents a compelling case that Tammet's outstanding memory is the result of very intensive deliberate practice with mnemonics. In particular, in archived versions of his old website ( from many years ago, Tammet says that his memory performance is the result of mnemonics and training.

    This casts doubt on Tammet's reported descriptions of his abilities in his books, which report that his abilities were acquired spontaneously at an early age rather than being acquired through training in adulthood.

    While not covered in Foer's book, there is also strong evidence from the scientific literature that Tammet's memory performances are the result of mnemonic training. "Routes to remembering - the brains behind superior memory", by Maguire et al from 2002, is a well known study that investigates the performance of 10 people with excellent memories (mostly competitors in memory competitions). It finds that all of the 10 reported training using mnemonics and intensive training to achieve their memory feats, and that superior memory was not driven by exceptional intellectual ability or structural brain differences.

    What appears to be less well known is that Tammet himself was one of these 10 participants in the study (although this is hardly a secret - Tammet said that he had participated on old versions of his own website, and savant expert Darold Treffert's repeats this information on his website). So we have a study that finds that Tammet's abilities are the result of training a "normal" brain, with no mention of synaesthesia or savantism. But this fact appears to have been almost universally ignored and forgotten about - I can find no comment on it anywhere in the scientific literature.

    Indeed, ironically, the paper by Bor, Billington and Baron-Cohen that you cite above actually cites the 2002 "Routes to Remembering" paper, as an example of a study of the "normal population with superior memories resulting from extensive practice", but the authors appear to be blissfully unaware that Tammet was a member of the "normal population" studied.

    Oversights like these, and a failure to investigate Tammet's background, have in my layman's view grossly distorted the reporting of Tammet's ability both in the media and in the scientific community. Lots of things are being written on Tammet which disregard the evidence that he has trained intensively using memory techniques, despite strong evidence that this is the case having been in the public domain for years.

    It's time that the whole scientific community took a more skeptical view of him, and challenge the media portrayals of him that suggest that his descriptions of his abilities are "scientifically proven", where this is not supported by a detailed and balanced reading of the scientific literature. At least, that's my take, although I'm not an expert myself - I would appreciate the expert view. Perhaps you could blog about it!

  12. Enjan, you make some good points, but I do not think that Daniel makes any secret of the fact that he uses mnemonic techniques for his feats of memory. The argument would be that his synaesthesia acts as a natural mnemonic and that his autistic traits include the kind of narrow and focused interest that would lead someone to even try to remember pi to 20,000 decimal places. Also, his calculation skills seem uncontested and are unexplained by any kind of mnemonics. Finally, I can say personally I find no reason to doubt his accounts - he seems quite a genuine and thoughtful person to me, for what that is worth.

  13. The explanation of his synaesthesia acting as a natural mnemonic has some plausibility, but also leaves some significant holes. In particular, it would imply that the researchers of the 2002 study completely missed the fact that one of the participants was using completely different memorisation techniques to the others.

    Furthermore, he participated in the 2000 world memory championship (under his birth name of Daniel Corney). He placed fourth overall, winning one event - the "names and faces" event, which requires remembering matching names and faces. Tammet reports no synaesthesia for faces, and indeed reports in his autobiography that he has significant trouble with recognising faces. So his best performance was in the event where synaesthesia could be expected to help him least.

    Further evidence is that if his abilities were a natural by-product of his synaesthesia, it might be expected that he would have shown his exceptional abilities at a reasonably early age. But evidence for this is weak. For example, the media vaunts his ability to learn a language in a week, while not mentioning that his school performance in languages was unexceptional (B grades in A-level French and German after many years' study). This is entirely consistent with him having learned memory techniques in adulthood, consistent with the evidence Foer presents.

    His calculation skills are uncontested, but also not hard to explain - they are unexceptional for people who have trained intensively (the Brainman documentary shows intensively drilled Japanese schoolchildren who would easily outperform him).

    You say you have no reason to doubt his accounts. The question then becomes which of his accounts to believe! Take a look at this, from an internet post from a "Daniel Tammet" advertising his "Optimnem" memory course in 2001:

    "Why are some people ‘Memory Masters’ and others can’t even remember what day of the week it is?
    Everybody’s memory capabilities are roughly the same, rather it is a question of HOW WELL someone uses their memory’s natural capabilities. A ‘Memory Master’ is not somebody with superior brain function or above-average intelligence (though they may not like to admit it!); all that separates them from most other people is that they have specially taught their memories to absorb data fully, quickly and accurately.

    I’m a very good example of this. If you had met me ten years ago and given me a shopping list to commit to memory I would have really struggled. It wasn’t that I was stupid, I just didn’t know the right tools and techniques. My school didn’t teach me how to remember, so I studied by myself and gradually developed the Optimnem course for maximal memory and Mindpower development and performance."

    None of the evidence here is completely conclusive. He might have synaesthesia, which might help his memory; he might have lied in his earlier internet postings claiming he was normal; the researchers in the 2002 study investigating exceptional memory might have somehow simply failed to notice that a unique one-in-a-million autistic savant with synaesthesia had come along to their study. But I think there's at least enough evidence here to proceed with a lot of caution and skepticism.

    For example, the paper by Baron-Cohen which includes his diagnosis of autism and synaesthesia includes a caveat that the observed "savant" memory might be achieved using standard mnemonics such as the method of loci. From what I've seen, that is a very important and necessary caveat that ought to be brought to the attention of everyone reporting on Tammet.

  14. "And you are correct that Daniel speaks a large number of languages fluently. Whether that relates at all to his prosopagnosia, I couldn't say."

    Daniel Tammet has prosopagnosia? There are some very conflicting accounts of Daniel Tammet's / Daniel Corney's ability to recognize faces:

    I think it is no accident that there is a clear effect of chronology on the content of the claim. The man has a past which is in conflict with his present.

  15. --------------------------
    Looking For Co-Author To Write A Comprehensive Book/Story about my life!
    David Lloyd | | Australia
    I am 53 years old.
    I have High Functioning Aspergers Syndrome.
    I have some Savant skills.
    I have a photographic memory
    I have excellent memory for detail
    I live a life of pictures
    I have seen my own mind
    I only talk to shop keepers or people that need to talk to me
    I stopped work in 2007, mechanical Trades & Engineering.
    I am an Autodidact
    I created an automated online business without knowing the industry, web-design, or talking to any other

    person. Only from words, images and video.
    I have the answer to endless free power based on Einstein,s formula
    I have a family that have never understood me
    I have a family that have never wanted to understand me
    I have never had a partner/relationship
    I find it difficult to socialize
    I have difficulty understanding people/vice versa
    I live in two worlds
    I have never had friends
    I observe people when they are not looking at me
    I look normal
    I am never lonely
    I am not homosexual
    I am very smart

    1. Dear David,
      Now that there are two of us we might form a club. Except neither one of us would ever attend the meetings.

  16. Nice blog to reading thanks for sharing such useful information this is very helpful for student who study Help Assignmentand keep continue to sharing useful information.

  17. Induced Savantism isn't that hard to come up with I don't have any Synaesthesia that I am aware of.

  18. This is definitely so true here. We only use 10% of our brain. This is definitely such a crazy stat here. I would like to see more research on why this is. Surrey movers

  19. I know of an individual who has passed, so there was no testing that I am aware of; however, ther is a huge body of work that speaks to different parts of Synaesthesia, and I have researched every combination or trigger listed. What I am saying is that there is remarkable memory, remarkable spatial abilities, remarkable color, hue and shadow and all of the visual is large scale. My question is , is there any way someone could look at one image and give an off-the-cuff impression. Even for this to be viewed by color number synaethete would be a marvel.

  20. Is there any synaesthetic research/testing that refers to extended dimensional placement similar to the discussions of months, years being spatially placed by synaesthetes. Specifically, a visual artist, interpreting a landscape into a 2d drawing, but the drawing becomes, infact all of his drawings become expansive multi-dimensional accounts of his viewings? Someone please respond.

  21. After study a few of the posts on this website now, and I truly like your way of blogging. I bookmarked it and will be checking back soon.
    Online Medical Assistant Programs

  22. I am no rain man, but maybe, just maybe I am a little bit of this! Otherwise ASMR is the everymans way of getting a taste of synesthesia.

  23. i like to see work done on savantism good work keep it up!!!
    brochure design

  24. This post is the best. Truly. All the pure knowledge and legit information is in this post. This article is not like those articles which tell us fake news. This is legit. Thanks a lot for that.

    Clipping Path


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Undetermined - a response to Robert Sapolsky. Part 1 - a tale of two neuroscientists

Grandma’s trauma – a critical appraisal of the evidence for transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in humans

Undetermined - a response to Robert Sapolsky. Part 2 - assessing the scientific evidence